PDF Print E-mail

Results on the Ground

Holistic Management Gets Results in the
Northern Rockies: Increasing Biodiversity and Profitability

Forty-three ranch managers in the Northern Rockies (Montana,Wyoming, Idaho) who had received training and had been practicing Holistic Management for two or more years, agreed to participate in our study through telephone interviews and written surveys.

Without exception, these managers all believe the land is evolving toward the holistic goal established for the ranch. Over half (56%) of them indicate they annually meet with team members and review their holistic goals.

Sixty percent of the managers indicate they are aware of their employees’ own personal goals and the areas they are seeking to improve. Ninety-eight percent have encouraged and paid for employees to attend special training.

The survey indicates that all of these ranchers are motivated, and most of them are highly motivated to continue Holistic Management because the goals they have set are becoming reality. Among the significant results:

Land monitoring shows that Holistic Management works
not just for land managers, but for the land itself:


Indicator Process Decreased No Change Increased
New seedling success succession 3% 12% 85%
Plant Diversity succession 15% 85%
Litter Cover on the Soil mineral cycle 13% 87%
Water Infiltration into the Soil water cycle 18% 82%
Soil Erosion water cycle 68% 15% 17%
Spacing Between Plants energy flow 37% 23% 40%

Holistic managers hold planning meetings.

Eighty-five percent hold regular team meetings for planning that deals with grazing, wildlife, riparian areas, land monitoring, and financial planning:

Type of Planning Frequency of Occurrence
Annual Grazing Strategy 85%
Implemented wildlife management practices 65%
Increased care for riparian areas 83%
Implemented formal documented land monitoring 60%
Annual documented financial plan and budget 78%

Eighty-five percent of the managers create and document a yearly grazing plan, and 87% have changed their grazing management strategy.

The majority (86%) has increased stocking rate, 97% have increased stock density, 77% have grouped livestock together, and 95% have obtained positive results from trampling. These ranchers are increasing stock density and stocking rate by adding cross fencing and/or increasing herd size. Some have upped stocking rates 30% to 50%.


Livestock performance improves along with the health and vigor of the land:

Observation Decreased No Change Increased
Conception rates 10% 49% 41%
Sire:Dam ratio 44% 36% 2%
Use of insecticides 55% 42% 3%
Fly problems 51% 9% 10%
Medication use 51% 46% 3%
Use of hormones 39% 58% 3%
Production per animal 7% 24% 69%
Production per acre 0% 7% 93%
Time spent with animals 0% 10% 90%

Increasingly, respondents see wildlife as an asset, 
and see positive changes in number, diversity, and habitat:

Indicator Decreased No Change Increased
Number of wildlife 2% 72%
Diversity of wildlife 58% 42%
Diversity of birds 43% 57%
Breeding sites 68% 32%
Nesting sites 32% 63%
Number of predators 25% 75%

Sixty percent of the respondents considered wildlife an asset. Nearly three-quarters (72%) have experienced an increase in numbers of wildlife, including predators.

"I am now timing our grazing around nesting, fawning, and calving. Predators are a concern, but all predators are not automatically bad.
We do need coyote control ... but not elimination."

templink